Back in the end of 2007, half a year after Google Reader had launched the sharing feature, I had an idea of a new service that would aggregate all the shared items and sort them according to the number of times one post was shared.
As it usually happens with the new ideas, somebody else had it too, and, most importantly, made it real before I had even started coding (actually, I had, but just a few lines). In a short while, a second similar aggregator appeared and, today, we are fortunate to have ReadBurner and RssMeme.
The two services, both dear to me, have a lot in common with one notable exception: RssMeme employs a kind of spider to find and aggregate shared items while ReadBurner is an opt in service.
In due course, other feed readers were added as sources: Bloglines, Netvibes, Newgator etc. and RssMeme went a bit further querying known services to find out whether an article had been bookmarked in any way.
The idea that what one shares through his feed reader is actually a vote or a recommendation is pretty solid, and, once a big number of sharers is reached, the power of statistics comes to play: the articles that emerge to the top are the ones that people truly feel are important. Isn’t this the essence of social bookmarking? And isn’t it also true that this essence is actually gamed in the digg like sites by a rather small group of people, despite the huge influx of traffic these sites enjoy?
One short visit to Readburner or RssMeme reveals though, that the articles that rise to the top, have been shared by such a small number of people that, with equal diggs, they would never see the light of day in digg.
Which leads to the conclusion that either the people who share are not that many, or they have not been included in the two aggregators yet.
Speaking of numbers, how many people really use Google Reader? I tried to google the question but came with no answer. I tried to google also the ‘google reader market share’, but came with no recent data either.
Without an idea of how many people use feed readers and share, it is pretty hard to make any predictions or recommendations. Yet, if we assume that it is only because it is too early (less than a year) that the sharing culture hasn’t spread and that it, eventually, will, we can fantasize one implication:
Some clever engineer will think of incorporating the share-votes into digg: a little bit of matching (is the sharer a digg user, and has the shared post been dugg already etc) and there you go.
But would that be a good thing?
Yes, it would. Because it would instill the democratic element of Readburner/RssMeme into digg. And, democracy is a good thing, isn’t it?